Vulnerability
research
Long investigations into how software breaks, from kernel memory handling to the boundaries that are supposed to keep workloads apart.
- Focus
- Systems · Memory · Isolation · AI
- Advisories
- 1
- Location
- Europe · Remote
Understand a system well enough to find what nobody was looking for.
Scanners find what they already know to look for. Research finds the rest.
Most security tooling matches signatures and patterns, so it finds bugs someone has already described. The findings that matter most are the ones no catalogue lists: an object freed while something still points at it, an assumption that holds on every path but one, a boundary the documentation promises and the code never enforces.
That work takes time and patience. It is the main thing Edictum Labs does.
Where the implementation detail decides the outcome.
- Operating-system and kernel security
- Memory corruption and memory safety
- Virtualization and isolation boundaries
- AI inference systems and native execution
- Security architecture and trust boundaries
- Implementation-level defect analysis
How we do the research.
Find the guarded sibling
Follow the input and the timing
Name the missing step
Keep receipts
We publish after the vendor has fixed it.
We do not publish private or unpatched vulnerability details.
When research touches third-party software, we follow coordinated disclosure. The vendor gets time to fix the issue before anything is public. We publish an advisory only once the vendor's fix and advisory are out, and list it on the research page.
See the security page for how we report and handle vulnerabilities.
Chasing the same bug class?
If you are researching kernel memory handling, isolation, or the native code behind inference, we are open to joint research, coordinated disclosure, and shared tooling. Write to the person doing the work.
- Open to
- Joint research · Disclosure · Tooling
- Reply
- Direct, from the researcher
- Location
- Europe · Remote